Summary: The connected ‘digital economy’, underpinned by telecoms, is evolving fast. How will it play out in the next 5 years, what are the rules, and who will win? Telco 2.0 analyses some new scenario thinking by IBM and clarifies the key issues that need to be addressed.
Overview
The
Special Briefing below reviews IBM's new 'Telco 2015' Scenarios, gives a
summary of how they fit with Telco
2.0 thinking, and outlines the key issues that executives in
the Telecoms, Media and Technology sectors need to address
to stimulate strategic growth.
Chart Preview: IBM's 2015 Scenarios and Telco 2.0: Where to Play in the Ecosystem (see below)
NB. You can download this FREE Special Briefing in PDF format here.
IBM's 2015 Telecoms Scenarios
IBM's Institute of
Business Value gave a fascinating presentation at Mobile World Congress in February
on Telco 2015: Five telling years, four future
scenarios, part of their smarter telecom initiative. It provides very useful context
for the new business models that Telco 2.0 has been proposing to the telecoms
industry to make it more relevant to stakeholders in the evolving ‘digital
economy'.
NB The IBM materials in this report are IBM copyrighted and reproduced from IBM's Executive Statement entitled "Telco 2015 Five telling years, four future scenarios". The full whitepaper can be requested by emailing IBM at iibv@us.ibm.com.
What does this mean for the
Telecoms industry?
The Telco 2.0
Initiative is currently focused on developing a clearer
‘roadmap to growth' for the industry: having defined the problems and the
options, what do telcos need to prepare for, as they continue ‘business as
usual'? We outline our scenarios for the roadmap below.
What does it mean for everyone
else?
At the same time, what
should online service providers, media companies, enterprise CIOs from multiple
vertical sectors, small businesses, governments, investors...and consumers ...be
demanding of telcos and the telecoms sector? Where's the value and which
players can best realise it? What does the new game really look
like, what are the new rules, who are the key players and...who wins?
What to do?
In addition to the
analysis below, this ‘roadmap to growth' is a key theme behind the 9th
Telco 2.0 Executive Brainstorm in London on 28-29 April 2010,
which drills down on key business model innovation areas around Digital
Entertainment, Wireless Network Economics, Mobile Marketing, Consumer
Data/Privacy, Rich Wholesale, M2M and Smart Grid, Digital Payments/Money,
AppStores and Devices. Importantly, underlying all of this, we're looking at the
issue of how to co-habit with Google, where to collaborate and where to compete.
Telco 2.0 is also about
to launch a new international ‘syndicated research' programme
looking at detailed ecosystem definition and sizing to help inform the roadmap.
IBM's Vision of the Future
At Mobile World
Congress in February, Ekow Nelson, from IBM's Institute for Business Value, presented
some interesting conclusions about the industry's possible future in 2015 based
on a scenario-planning methodology.
Fig 1. IBM's 2015 Telecoms Scenarios
‘Clash of the Giants'
If the addressable
market expands but the industry consolidates, we could expect to see a ‘clash
of the titans' between a few huge telcos and Web 2.0 platform players - or essentially
AT&T versus Google.
‘Survivor Consolidation'
If consolidation
without growth occurs, we could expect a sort of nightmare scenario - huge,
monopolistic operators and stultifying conservatism.
‘Generative Bazaar'
But things get
interesting if competition, rather than consolidation, dominates; Ekow argued
that we might see either a "Generative Bazaar", if both fragmentation
and growth occurred, or else a "market shakeout", if the
fragmentation persisted without growth. What's really interesting is his
description of these two scenarios.
He characterised ‘Generative
Bazaar' as follows:
Barriers between OTT
[Over The Top] and network providers blur as regulation, technology and
competition drive open access. Infrastructure providers integrate horizontally
to form a limited number of network co-operatives that provide pervasive
affordable and unrestricted open connectivity to any person, device or object,
including a rapidly expanding class of innovative asset-light service
providers.
That's very Telco
2.0-like, especially the mutual
dependence between open access to shared civil works infrastructure and agile,
service- and application-led, software-based entrepreneurship.
‘Market Shakeout'
What about the more
pessimistic of the two right-hand scenarios? ‘Market Shakeout' is quite Telco 2.0 as well:
Under prolonged
economic downturn, investors force carriers to disaggregate assets into
separate businesses with different return profiles, and retail brands emerge to
aggregate and package services from disaggregated units. The market is further
fragmented by government, municipality and alternative provider initiatives (e.g.
local housing associations or utility) that extend ultra-fast broadband to gray
areas, while private infrastructure investments are limited to densely
populated areas. Operators look for growth through horizontal expansion and
premium connectivity services sold to application and content providers as well
as businesses and consumers.
The Telco 2.0 View
We think that there
isn't really that much difference between these last two scenarios. Investor
pressure for network sharing and tower-selling would be even more powerful in
the context of prolonged macroeconomic gloom, and that the lure of cheap VoIP -
Skype on mobile - would be even stronger.
We're arguably
already seeing this - a subtheme at Mobile World Congress last month was
carriers making deals with OTT voice players, notably Skype and Fring, and now
Nokia too. (Ed. - the strategy execs from
these three companies will be at the Telco 2.0 Exec Brainstorm on 28-29 April in London).
The following chart
compares the different scenarios in terms of forecast growth relative to GDP.
Fig 2. IBM's Forecast of Growth Vs. GDP by Scenario
You should be able to see that
the ‘Generative Bazaar' scenario delivers the best result for ‘Telecoms
Services Growth'.
Moreover, the better the
industry is expected to do in these scenarios, the more revenue will come from
connectivity rather than legacy voice or content as the following chart shows.
Fig 3. IBM Scenarios: Revenue Split by Product
Telco 2.0's Scenarios for 2015
The Future is more Horizontal...
Like any good scenario
plan, some of the value of IBM's work comes from seeking to identify which
scenarios are most and least likely. In our view the dimension of consolidated/vertical versus
fragmented/horizontal is not really meaningful since consolidated/vertical is
already the legacy industry structure and it seems increasingly clear that we
are moving inexorably to a horizontal future (as shown on the right of the
first IBM chart).
...not necessarily Fragmented...
In other words, the
x-axis of the chart really plots time rather than likely future states. Having
said that, it is really not clear if the industry will be fragmented in the
long term or not, since it is perfectly possible to have horizontal
consolidation as Google has shown in the area of advertising. We don't think,
therefore, that ‘horizontal' and ‘fragmentation' should be linked together.
...and there are new opportunities
too
What's also missing
from the analysis is a sense of new growth opportunities for the telecoms
industry. ‘Communications, Connectivity, and Content' are the existing industry
service categories. But where are the B2B payment services, marketing services
(beyond advertising), identity services, richer wholesale and content delivery
services and, indeed, ‘voice 2.0' or what we refer to as
‘communications-enabled business processes'?
The New Opportunities use a ‘two-sided'
Business Model
Followers of Telco
2.0 will know that we have modelled the opportunities in these areas, as
described in the charts below, and are working with the industry (and 3rd
party industries who may want to use more sophisticated telecoms platform
services) to help realise the growth potential.
Fig 4. Money comes from both sides in the ‘Two-Sided' Business
Model
For those new to
Telco 2.0, and for those in need of a refresher,
our vision of a future ‘digital economy' is based on the following themes,
issues and questions that any predictions of the future need to address.
We are seeing a
move along two dimensions:
·
From
‘one-sided' to ‘two-sided' business models;
·
From
distinct ‘telco' and ‘web 2.0' products and services, to blends, mash-ups and
hybrids of the two.
Fig 5. Telco 2.0 Future VAS Revenue Potential by Application
Source: Telco 2.0 - The ‘Two-Sided' Telecoms Market
Opportunity Report
Telco 2.0's Scenarios
In our view, the important dimensions of the scenario matrix are 'Who Pays?' for the service, and 'Whose Product?' is being delivered.
Fig 6. The Telco 2.0
Initiatve Scenario Map
We see ‘Telco 1.0'
- where the end-user (consumer, enterprise, SME) predominantly pays the telco
for telecoms products - shrinking. Telcos are moving (slowly) into ‘Telco 1.5' and
‘Hybrid' areas (see chart above) using better retailing solutions from certain
vendors. At the same time, the web 2.0 and ‘Over The Top' market (dominated by
big players like Google and Facebook) is getting more and more entrenched and
powerful.
In our view the
‘Clash of the Titans', described by IBM, is not a ‘possibility', it is
absolutely going to happen - but it is part of the story not the conclusion.
Telcos will continue to partner with these major players who fall squarely into
the ‘frenemy' camp (part friend, part enemy) and will compete hard to control
the interface between ‘upstream' organisations (especially advertisers) and end
users.
So, the future
‘Digital Economy 2.0' we describe in the chart above is approaching, but the
rules have changed and there are new players emerging and so the key question
is who wins - is it telcos or others?
We explore these
questions in much more detail in our forthcoming report on Future Broadband
Business Models 2.0,
but for now the key questions we'd like you to consider are:
Could ‘OTT' players take value by becoming
bigger aggregators and/or enablers of telecoms-enhanced e-commerce? Players such as Google use their knowledge
of end users and upstream players, coupled with Telco connectivity, to
facilitate the delivery of a wider portfolio of products and services (their
own and third-party).
Could other smart intermediaries take value
by aggregating telco (and others' assets), leaving telcos as commodity providers
of raw materials? Ubiquitous,
advanced telecommunications capabilities are a pre-requisite for the success of
the ‘digital economy'. A number of organisations who are looking at playing a
role in the aggregation of telco capabilities could capture most ‘platform'
value.
Could telcos take value by becoming trusted aggregators
and/or enablers of e-commerce via real B2B support services? This was the original Telco 2.0 model we
envisaged back in 2006, where operators work together to leverage their core
assets to build a set of interoperable platforms that help third-parties
improve the effectiveness and efficiency of their everyday business processes.
In determining the answer to these questions, we believe there are two important
factors:
Operators' approach to developing the ‘two-sided'
business model proposition
The extent to which telcos can collaborate
to kick-start the market place in which they could all succeed
Operators' approach to the ‘Two-Sided'
Proposition
End-users and
service businesses, the key players in the ‘digital economy', do not generally
buy ‘raw materials' and then manufacture their own solutions. Instead they seek
ready-made products and convenient services. An approach in which telcos simply
expose raw assets via APIs is, therefore, unlikely to succeed.
Fig 7. Where to play in the Ecosystem?
Clearly, operators
do not have the skills to develop complete one-stop shop services in every area
of market opportunity. Determining where they play on the continuum described
in the chart above (individually, but also collectively in local markets and/or
globally) is a key strategic decision and will vary by:
Vertical
Market. In some industries, operators will have
strong skills and markets will be fragmented enough to offer more scope to
provide more complete solutions and services. In other markets, with
well-established ecosystems and/or stronger vertical integration, operators
will play more of an enabler or raw material provider;
Geography/region. For
example, where individual operators have a strong (50%+) market share (in
Turkey and Japan for example) they will be more aggressive in adding more value
to the core Telco platform;
Horizontal
telecoms capability. Different
operators, or sets of operators, will have different skills and asset qualities
and may wish to take greater or lesser roles in the marketplace depending on
their specific circumstances.
When to Compete, when to
Collaborate?
When, where and how should and can telcos legitimately
co-operate to create new markets? When do the benefits of working together to
create mutual opportunities and ‘float all boats', exceed the benefits of
head-on market competition? What are the bounds of anti-trust when it takes
collaboration to create new competition?
These are important strategic questions for operators
and the answers will to some extent vary by vertical market, by geography, and by horizontal
capability. For some opportunities,
particularly where new customer connections are needed (e.g. for Smart Grids)
operators may choose a go-it-alone strategy. In others, where upstream service
providers need to be able to reach all Telco end-users in a certain geography
or domain (e.g. Advertising), operators will need to collaborate (even if this
ends up yielding some value to third-party aggregators).
We are also
embarking on a syndicated analysis project to explore the potential ecosystems,
business models and market sizes for specific ‘Digital Economy 2.0'
opportunities. This will address the key strategic questions outlined
above.
NB. You can download this FREE Special Briefing in PDF format here.
26 Comments Posted Leave a comment